| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c75858662b90592ae3f3ab57d4500381a28bafe5.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:53:15 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+b42fe626038981fb7bfa@...kalhler.appspotmail.com>,
hdanton@...a.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
miklos@...redi.hu, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in mnt_want_write (2)
Thank you for the reproducer. This seems to be a similar false
positive as was discussed:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/000000000000c5b77105b4c3546e@google.com/
thanks,
Mimi
On Sat, 2022-07-02 at 10:27 -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 089866061428 Merge tag 'libnvdimm-fixes-5.19-rc5' of git:/..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11dd91f0080000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=75c9ff14e1db87c0
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b42fe626038981fb7bfa
> compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=167bafc0080000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=11aad3e0080000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+b42fe626038981fb7bfa@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 5.19.0-rc4-syzkaller-00187-g089866061428 #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor450/3829 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88807e574460 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:393
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff888074de91a0 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: process_measurement+0x7d2/0x1c10 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:260
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> lock_acquire+0x1a7/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665
> __mutex_lock_common+0x1de/0x26c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
> __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
> mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
> process_measurement+0x7d2/0x1c10 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:260
> ima_file_check+0xe7/0x160 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:517
> do_open fs/namei.c:3522 [inline]
> path_openat+0x2705/0x2ec0 fs/namei.c:3653
> do_filp_open+0x277/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3680
> do_sys_openat2+0x13b/0x500 fs/open.c:1278
> do_sys_open fs/open.c:1294 [inline]
> __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1302 [inline]
> __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1298 [inline]
> __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1298
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
>
> -> #0 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
> validate_chain+0x185c/0x65c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829
> __lock_acquire+0x129a/0x1f80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
> lock_acquire+0x1a7/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665
> percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
> __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1699 [inline]
> sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1a0 include/linux/fs.h:1774
> mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:393
> ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x124/0x190 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:1078
> ovl_open+0x106/0x2a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:152
> do_dentry_open+0x789/0x1040 fs/open.c:848
> vfs_open fs/open.c:981 [inline]
> dentry_open+0xc1/0x120 fs/open.c:997
> ima_calc_file_hash+0x157/0x1cb0 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:557
> ima_collect_measurement+0x3de/0x850 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c:292
> process_measurement+0xf87/0x1c10 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:337
> ima_file_check+0xe7/0x160 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:517
> do_open fs/namei.c:3522 [inline]
> path_openat+0x2705/0x2ec0 fs/namei.c:3653
> do_filp_open+0x277/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3680
> do_sys_openat2+0x13b/0x500 fs/open.c:1278
> do_sys_open fs/open.c:1294 [inline]
> __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1302 [inline]
> __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1298 [inline]
> __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1298
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&iint->mutex);
> lock(sb_writers#4);
> lock(&iint->mutex);
> lock(sb_writers#4);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by syz-executor450/3829:
> #0: ffff888074de91a0 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: process_measurement+0x7d2/0x1c10 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:260
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 3829 Comm: syz-executor450 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-syzkaller-00187-g089866061428 #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/29/2022
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2cb lib/dump_stack.c:106
> check_noncircular+0x2f7/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
> validate_chain+0x185c/0x65c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829
> __lock_acquire+0x129a/0x1f80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
> lock_acquire+0x1a7/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665
> percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
> __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1699 [inline]
> sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1a0 include/linux/fs.h:1774
> mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:393
> ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x124/0x190 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:1078
> ovl_open+0x106/0x2a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:152
> do_dentry_open+0x789/0x1040 fs/open.c:848
> vfs_open fs/open.c:981 [inline]
> dentry_open+0xc1/0x120 fs/open.c:997
> ima_calc_file_hash+0x157/0x1cb0 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:557
> ima_collect_measurement+0x3de/0x850 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c:292
> process_measurement+0xf87/0x1c10 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:337
> ima_file_check+0xe7/0x160 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:517
> do_open fs/namei.c:3522 [inline]
> path_openat+0x2705/0x2ec0 fs/namei.c:3653
> do_filp_open+0x277/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3680
> do_sys_openat2+0x13b/0x500 fs/open.c:1278
> do_sys_open fs/open.c:1294 [inline]
> __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1302 [inline]
> __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1298 [inline]
> __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1298
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> RIP: 0033:0x7faf98402749
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 31 16 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007faf9838e2f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007faf98491270 RCX: 00007faf98402749
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000b RDI: 00000000200000c0
> RBP: 00007faf98458504 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0030656c69662f2e
> R13: 3d7269647265776f R14: 0079616c7265766f R15: 00007faf98491278
> </TASK>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists