[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b006448b-811f-a188-5bae-a7f9279a326b@paragon-software.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 16:34:16 +0300
From: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>, <ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev>
CC: <syzbot+c95173762127ad76a824@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ntfs3: fix NULL deref in ntfs_update_mftmirr
On 6/9/22 19:42, Konstantin Komarov wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/22 14:42, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>> On 4/21/22 23:53, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>>> If ntfs_fill_super() wasn't called then sbi->sb will be equal to NULL.
>>> Code should check this ptr before dereferencing. Syzbot hit this issue
>>> via passing wrong mount param as can be seen from log below
>>>
>>> Fail log:
>>> ntfs3: Unknown parameter 'iochvrset'
>>> general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
>>> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000018-0x000000000000001f]
>>> CPU: 1 PID: 3589 Comm: syz-executor210 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc3-syzkaller-00016-gb253435746d9 #0
>>> ...
>>> Call Trace:
>>> <TASK>
>>> put_ntfs+0x1ed/0x2a0 fs/ntfs3/super.c:463
>>> ntfs_fs_free+0x6a/0xe0 fs/ntfs3/super.c:1363
>>> put_fs_context+0x119/0x7a0 fs/fs_context.c:469
>>> do_new_mount+0x2b4/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3044
>>> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
>>> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
>>>
>>> Fixes: 82cae269cfa9 ("fs/ntfs3: Add initialization of super block")
>>> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c95173762127ad76a824@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
>>
>> gentle ping
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> With regards,
>> Pavel Skripkin
>
> 1st patch is correct.
> 2nd patch is a good catch, but I'm not sure if simply ignoring is good.
> If mftmirr is broken / missing, then theoretically we can continue working.
> But still it's a major fs error.
> I'm thinking about exiting mount with error, and if "force" is present,
> then continue with mount.
> I'll reply again when I'll be sure what is correct behavior.
> Thank you for your work!
I've accepted both patches.
I don't want to invent convoluted logic for mftmirr.
Thanks again for your work!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists