[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfcbeMt=OUamfyoheqxX1gcCoov+976ewPUerfH=wSxRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 17:25:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: SOF: Intel: bdw: remove duplicating driver
data retrieval
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 3:19 PM Péter Ujfalusi
<peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 04/07/2022 19:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 10:31:48AM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 03/07/2022 17:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> >> + return sof_acpi_probe(pdev, (const struct sof_dev_desc *)id->driver_data);
> >> }
> >
> >> We don't use the desc in sof_broadwell_probe(), so we can just pass the id->driver_data
> >
> > I prefer not to cast inside the function parameters when it's not about POD.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> How about assigning desc before it is used?
As answered in the other email, I'm fine to modify the change accordingly.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists