| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 17:33:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] bus: hisi_lpc: Don't guard ACPI IDs with ACPI_PTR()
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 5:27 PM John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 16:15, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> >>> The OF is not guarded, neither ACPI needs.
> >> This doesn't read well.
> > "The OF is not guarded, neither ACPI needs it."
> >
> > Better? Otherwise please propose how it can be amended here.
>
> How about "The OF ID table is not guarded, and the ACPI table does not
> needs it either."?
FIne with me.
...
> > Strictly speaking, yes we need mod_devicetable.h. But of.h and acpi.h
> > include it.
>
> acpi.h does not include it for !CONFIG_ACPI, which is the only one which
> I had checked. But now I see that of.h always includes it, so what you
> are doing is ok.
What a surprise. I was under the impression that acpi.h always
includes it. Hmm... Probably we never had drivers that in Kconfig have
something like "depends on ACPI || COMPILE_TEST (and at the same time
have no explicit mod_devicetable.h inclusion nor implicit providers
like of.h), which should immediately point to the issue.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists