linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib: overflow: Do not define 64-bit tests on 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 08:36:45 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: overflow: Do not define 64-bit tests on 32-bit

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 05:47:10PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The 64-bit overflow tests will trigger 64-bit division on 32-bit hosts,
> which is not currently used anywhere in the kernel, and tickles bugs
> in at least Clang 13 and earlier:
> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1636
> 
> In reality, there shouldn't be a reason to not build the 64-bit test
> cases on 32-bit systems, so these #ifdefs can be removed once the minimum
> Clang version reaches 13.

                        ^ 14, as clang 13 has the problem too.

> 
> In the meantime, silence W=1 warnings given by the current code:
> 
> ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:191:19: warning: 's64_tests' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   191 | DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(s64) = {
>       |                   ^~~
> ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:24:11: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY'
>    24 |         } t ## _tests[]
>       |           ^
> ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:94:19: warning: 'u64_tests' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>    94 | DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(u64) = {
>       |                   ^~~
> ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:24:11: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY'
>    24 |         } t ## _tests[]
>       |           ^
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202205110324.7GrtxG8u-lkp@intel.com
> Fixes: 455a35a6cdb6 ("lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions")
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGS_qxokQAjQRip2vPi80toW7hmBnXf=KMTNT51B1wuDqSZuVQ@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

It might be nice to do something like:

/* Clang 13 and earlier generate unwanted libcalls on 32-bit. */
#if !(defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION >= 140000) && BITS_PER_LONG == 32
#define EXCLUDE_64_BIT_OVERFLOW
#endif

#ifndef EXCLUDE_64_BIT_OVERFLOW
...
#endif

so that we can easily grep for CLANG_VERSION and clean this up when we
bump to a minimum version of 14.0.0 and that the scope of the workaround
is limited to the cases where it is known not to work.

However, that is ultimately up to you. Regardless:

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>

> ---
>  lib/overflow_kunit.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/overflow_kunit.c b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
> index 475f0c064bf6..7e3e43679b73 100644
> --- a/lib/overflow_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(u32) = {
>  	{-4U, 5U, 1U, -9U, -20U, true, false, true},
>  };
>  
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>  DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(u64) = {
>  	{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, false, false, false},
>  	{1, 1, 2, 0, 1, false, false, false},
> @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(u64) = {
>  	 false, true, false},
>  	{-15ULL, 10ULL, -5ULL, -25ULL, -150ULL, false, false, true},
>  };
> +#endif
>  
>  DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(s8) = {
>  	{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, false, false, false},
> @@ -188,6 +190,8 @@ DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(s32) = {
>  	{S32_MIN, S32_MIN, 0, 0, 0, true, false, true},
>  	{S32_MAX, S32_MAX, -2, 0, 1, true, false, true},
>  };
> +
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>  DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(s64) = {
>  	{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, false, false, false},
>  
> @@ -216,6 +220,7 @@ DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(s64) = {
>  	{-128, -1, -129, -127, 128, false, false, false},
>  	{0, -S64_MAX, -S64_MAX, S64_MAX, 0, false, false, false},
>  };
> +#endif
>  
>  #define check_one_op(t, fmt, op, sym, a, b, r, of) do {		\
>  	t _r;							\
> @@ -650,6 +655,7 @@ static struct kunit_case overflow_test_cases[] = {
>  	KUNIT_CASE(s16_overflow_test),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(u32_overflow_test),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(s32_overflow_test),
> +/* Clang 13 and earlier generate unwanted libcalls on 32-bit. */
>  #if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>  	KUNIT_CASE(u64_overflow_test),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(s64_overflow_test),
> -- 
> 2.32.0
>