[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62c461af.1c69fb81.25b26.c45e@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 17:40:18 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add ipq806x missing bindings
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 05:55:14PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 16:04, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >>> This series try to add some of the missing bindings for ipq806x.
> >>>
> >>> This still lacks of the cpu bindings and all the bindings required
> >>> to scale cpu clk or L2. These will come later as the driver and
> >>> documentation require some changes.
> >>>
> >>> So for now we try to add bindings that can directly applied without
> >>> making changes to any drivers.
> >>
> >> You mention here and in subject bindings, but your patchset does not
> >> have any bindings.
> >>
> >
> > What would be correct word? Node? Compatible?
>
> "device node" or just "node"
>
Ok will fix it in v2 and also in other patch where I used binding
instead of node.
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists