[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsRysg0Wm97iOgWo@gerhold.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 19:19:46 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible
naming
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:13:01PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Compatibles can come in two formats. Either "vendor,ip-soc" or
> "vendor,soc-ip". Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a
> DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new
> compatibles, except few existing patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
[...]
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0be18c1d2961
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
[...]
> + pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
FWIW: There is also the "qcm" prefix, used e.g. in "qcom,qcm2290-tlmm".
Also, the APQ equivalent of "sdm" would be "sda", e.g. SDA845 which is
used in the DB845c. (Not sure if someone will ever use the SDA variant
in a compatible though.)
Thanks,
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists