linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,sdm845: convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YsRzYKAjA7LBVf86@gerhold.net>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 19:22:40 +0200
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,sdm845: convert to dtschema

On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 09:32:07AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/07/2022 18:50, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > Can you check if you can just add the compatibles to the existing
> > qcom,sm8250.yaml? It should be more or less identical given that the DT
> > parsing code in the driver is shared between all these SoCs.
> > I already added the MSM8916 compatibles there a while ago.
> > 
> > It also documents some additional properties ("pin-switches", "widgets")
> > that are supported for SDM845 through the common code but are missing
> > in its binding documentation.
> 
> I thought about merging these but then I would have to disallow these
> properties, as I assumed these are not valid for SDM845. Are you saying
> that pin-switches and widgets are actually valid for SDM845?
> 

Yes. I haven't tested it but it's implemented in the common DT parsing
code and I don't see why it wouldn't work. These are optional properties
that are only needed in certain special audio configurations. There
might be a SDM845 board out there that needs them. :)

Thanks,
Stephan