[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsR0yw80NgUTNXys@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 19:28:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] locking/qspinlock: stop renaming
queued_spin_lock_slowpath to native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 12:38:15AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> The native version can simply be queued_spin_lock_slowpath, and the
> paravirt version __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath, which is as they are
> named in the C code.
>
Humm... so it is the x86 paravirt convention to have native_*()
functions for everthing, which sometimes are unconditionally called
whenever the paravirt indirection is unwarranted etc..
I suppose that's not the case with the spinlock code thouhg, so yeah,
why not.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists