[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2dcc7854-643c-0c77-b0b6-9443b9ee1dcd@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 14:11:20 +0800
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org,
keescook@...omium.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] netfs: do not get the folio reference twice
On 7/5/22 10:22 AM, xiubli@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
>
> And also the comment said it will drop the folio references but
> the code was increasing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> index 5b93e22397fe..a44a5b3b8d4c 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> @@ -396,9 +396,6 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
> */
> ractl._nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> netfs_rreq_expand(rreq, &ractl);
> -
> - /* We hold the folio locks, so we can drop the references */
> - folio_get(folio);
> while (readahead_folio(&ractl))
> ;
>
Will drop this patch, the above fix it incorrect.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists