linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: avs: correct config reference for I2S test board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <165704713892.1050281.16411314466657755512.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 05 Jul 2022 19:52:18 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        cezary.rojewski@...el.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc:     peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com, liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
        ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com,
        tiwai@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: avs: correct config reference for I2S test board

On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 12:32:38 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Commit e39acc4cfd92 ("ASoC: Intel: avs: Add I2S-test machine board") adds
> the config "SND_SOC_INTEL_AVS_MACH_I2S_TEST", but in the Makefile refers
> to  config "SND_SOC_INTEL_AVS_MACH_i2s_TEST" (notice the uppercase and
> lowercase difference).
> 
> Adjust the Makefile to refer to the actual existing config.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: Intel: avs: correct config reference for I2S test board
      commit: f4ba35b79bd0104f00e8e21e400b980bfaa2f17e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark