[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b6f3f9f-71c8-2b6f-20a3-5e9c259a1b9a@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:52:10 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface
driver
On 7/5/22 11:45, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> Yes, there are many ways to design this. But I still think IOCTL is a better fit
> for the request/response kind of use case.
Are there any other similar ABIs in the kernel? What kind of mechanism
do they use?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists