[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5djQOzRsW-JaRPzaAnh64WgHiGvHxc1UdAUV43tirukg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 14:21:56 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] LoongArch: Enable ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
Hi, Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:18 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 1:25 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> > To avoid the following build error on LoongArch we should include linux/
> > static_key.h in page-flags.h.
> >
> > In file included from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:22,
> > from ./include/linux/gfp.h:6,
> > from ./include/linux/mm.h:7,
> > from arch/loongarch/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
> > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:208:1: warning: data definition has no
> > type or storage class
> > 208 | DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP_DEFAULT_ON,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:208:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in
> > declaration of 'DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE' [-Werror=implicit-int]
> > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:209:26: warning: parameter names (without
> > types) in function declaration
>
> I wonder if page_fixed_fake_head() should be moved out of line to avoid
> this, it's already nontrivial here, and that would avoid the static key
> in a central header.
I have some consideration here. I think both inline function and
static key are instruments to make things faster, in other words,
page_fixed_fake_head() is a performance critical function. If so, it
is not suitable to move it out of line.
Huacai
>
> Arnd
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists