lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12246439-def4-4b57-f426-461862c717c9@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 21:23:14 +0200
From:   Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To:     Rommel Rodriguez Perez <alrodperez@...il.com>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: Block comments use * on subsequent
 lines

On 7/5/22 01:55, Rommel Rodriguez Perez wrote:
> This patch modifies a comment in order for it to comply with Linux
> Kernel style guidelines on comments belonging to  net/ or drivers/net/ by
> fixing the missing * at the beginning of each comment line and removing
> the initial almost-blank initial line from the comment block.
> 
> checkpatch output:
> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rommel Rodriguez Perez <alrodperez@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c
> index ac6effbecf6d..5bd9dfa57cc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c
> @@ -654,18 +654,17 @@ void update_beacon(struct adapter *padapter, u8 ie_id, u8 *oui, u8 tx)
>   		set_tx_beacon_cmd(padapter);
>   }
>   
> -/*
> -op_mode
> -Set to 0 (HT pure) under the following conditions
> -	- all STAs in the BSS are 20/40 MHz HT in 20/40 MHz BSS or
> -	- all STAs in the BSS are 20 MHz HT in 20 MHz BSS
> -Set to 1 (HT non-member protection) if there may be non-HT STAs
> -	in both the primary and the secondary channel
> -Set to 2 if only HT STAs are associated in BSS,
> -	however and at least one 20 MHz HT STA is associated
> -Set to 3 (HT mixed mode) when one or more non-HT STAs are associated
> -	(currently non-GF HT station is considered as non-HT STA also)
> -*/
> +/* op_mode
> + * Set to 0 (HT pure) under the following conditions
> + *	- all STAs in the BSS are 20/40 MHz HT in 20/40 MHz BSS or
> + *	- all STAs in the BSS are 20 MHz HT in 20 MHz BSS
> + * Set to 1 (HT non-member protection) if there may be non-HT STAs
> + *	in both the primary and the secondary channel
> + * Set to 2 if only HT STAs are associated in BSS,
> + *	however and at least one 20 MHz HT STA is associated
> + * Set to 3 (HT mixed mode) when one or more non-HT STAs are associated
> + *	(currently non-GF HT station is considered as non-HT STA also)
> + */
>   static int rtw_ht_operation_update(struct adapter *padapter)
>   {
>   	u16 cur_op_mode, new_op_mode;

Reviewed-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ