lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 12:46:10 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     x86 <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/split_lock: Enable the split lock detect feature on
 Raptor Lake P and Alder Lake N CPUs

I have an alternative patch.

Let's just consider the MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT bit to be
architectural.  Are there *ACTUAL* implementations where this is wrong?
 If not, let's just make it part of the architecture.  Intel can then
keep it true forever.

Some documentation which says:

	All processors that enumerate support for MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS and
	set MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT support split lock 	
	detection.

would suffice, I think.  Just look at the diffstat.  What's not to love?
View attachment "split-lock-arch.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2832 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ