[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsSpmi5oS0po5Cv2@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:14:02 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org, wens@...e.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
perex@...ex.cz, arnaud.ferraris@...labora.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.com,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, mripard@...nel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/3] ASoC: sun50i-codec-analog: Internal bias
support
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 11:04:54PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Dne torek, 05. julij 2022 ob 22:58:32 CEST je Mark Brown napisal(a):
> > I can if the sunxi maintainers like, but normally changes to the DTs go
> > via the platform tree.
> I am sunxi maintainer. Wouldn't my branch generate warnings, if I have only DT
> changes but not bindings?
I guess, I think people tend not to worry about it so long as -next is
OK. The issue with merging things through subsystem trees is that it's
very easy to generate lots of conflicts which tends to cause more issues
overall.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists