[an error occurred while processing this directive]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d1909e6-54bf-5511-74e0-e9c62fcf66c3@bytedance.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 16:02:20 +0800
From:   Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To:     Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: move nohz definition to where
 it's used

On 2022/7/5 15:50, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 23/06/22 21:03, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> The nohz definition is too far from where it's used, just move it
>> to the right place. No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> 
> Standalone cosmetic changes are very unlikely to get anywhere, I'd suggest
> bundling this with some other non-cosmetic patches hitting the area.
> 

Right, make sense, just minor grumble when review the code, sorry for noise.

Thanks.