linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] LoongArch: Enable ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a14VTkTjRNTWsGmwLDuVm=QPL17_VZ8QkcCYnyQzBjXHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 10:05:52 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] LoongArch: Enable ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:51 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:22 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Arnd,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:18 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 1:25 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> > > > To avoid the following build error on LoongArch we should include linux/
> > > > static_key.h in page-flags.h.
> > > >
> > > > In file included from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:22,
> > > > from ./include/linux/gfp.h:6,
> > > > from ./include/linux/mm.h:7,
> > > > from arch/loongarch/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
> > > > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:208:1: warning: data definition has no
> > > > type or storage class
> > > > 208 | DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP_DEFAULT_ON,
> > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:208:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in
> > > > declaration of 'DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE' [-Werror=implicit-int]
> > > > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:209:26: warning: parameter names (without
> > > > types) in function declaration
> > >
> > > I wonder if page_fixed_fake_head() should be moved out of line to avoid
> > > this, it's already nontrivial here, and that would avoid the static key
> > > in a central header.
> > I have some consideration here. I think both inline function and
> > static key are instruments to make things faster, in other words,
> > page_fixed_fake_head() is a performance critical function. If so, it
> > is not suitable to move it out of line.
>
> +1
>
> The static key is an optimization when HVO is disabled.

How about splitting up linux/page_flags.h so the static_key header is
only included
in those places that use one of the inline functions that depend on it?

       Arnd