lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b91ee2f-3e87-c18c-aa04-2cd93273b63f@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 13:32:30 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/43] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie: add
 example node

On 05/07/2022 12:22, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/07/2022 11:42, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> Add an example node based on a cleaned up version of msm8996.dtsi.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>>
>> Squash it, please.
> 
> Why? It's a new addition to the schema.

Because it is not really new. When you add new bindings or convert
existing ones (without example), it is expected that example is within
that commit. You do here the same - add entirely new file. Old file had
example and the bindings. You now split some pieces, convert it, so new
file is also expected to come with the bindings.

The same as there is no point to make half-TXT-YAML conversion, there is
no point in half-split of existing bindings. Either this split is
correct and complete, or it's not a finished commit and we do not commit
half-commits.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ