linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 46/84] xfs: update superblock counters correctly for !lazysbcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220705115616.670135979@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Jul 2022 13:58:09 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>,
        Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 46/84] xfs: update superblock counters correctly for !lazysbcount

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

commit 6543990a168acf366f4b6174d7bd46ba15a8a2a6 upstream.

Keep the mount superblock counters up to date for !lazysbcount
filesystems so that when we log the superblock they do not need
updating in any way because they are already correct.

It's found by what Zorro reported:
1. mkfs.xfs -f -l lazy-count=0 -m crc=0 $dev
2. mount $dev $mnt
3. fsstress -d $mnt -p 100 -n 1000 (maybe need more or less io load)
4. umount $mnt
5. xfs_repair -n $dev
and I've seen no problem with this patch.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c     |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -956,9 +956,19 @@ xfs_log_sb(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = tp->t_mountp;
 	struct xfs_buf		*bp = xfs_trans_getsb(tp);
 
-	mp->m_sb.sb_icount = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_icount);
-	mp->m_sb.sb_ifree = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_ifree);
-	mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_fdblocks);
+	/*
+	 * Lazy sb counters don't update the in-core superblock so do that now.
+	 * If this is at unmount, the counters will be exactly correct, but at
+	 * any other time they will only be ballpark correct because of
+	 * reservations that have been taken out percpu counters. If we have an
+	 * unclean shutdown, this will be corrected by log recovery rebuilding
+	 * the counters from the AGF block counts.
+	 */
+	if (xfs_sb_version_haslazysbcount(&mp->m_sb)) {
+		mp->m_sb.sb_icount = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_icount);
+		mp->m_sb.sb_ifree = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_ifree);
+		mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_fdblocks);
+	}
 
 	xfs_sb_to_disk(bp->b_addr, &mp->m_sb);
 	xfs_trans_buf_set_type(tp, bp, XFS_BLFT_SB_BUF);
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -615,6 +615,9 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
 
 	/* apply remaining deltas */
 	spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
+	mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks += tp->t_fdblocks_delta + tp->t_res_fdblocks_delta;
+	mp->m_sb.sb_icount += idelta;
+	mp->m_sb.sb_ifree += ifreedelta;
 	mp->m_sb.sb_frextents += rtxdelta;
 	mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks += tp->t_dblocks_delta;
 	mp->m_sb.sb_agcount += tp->t_agcount_delta;