lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W7gzG4xSsR3HxOv96ytzyNvT5a1oQnmy4F0BqpCOChOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 09:34:22 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] docs: arm: index.rst: add google/chromebook-boot-flow

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 4:07 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This document was added without placing it at arm book.
>
> Fixes: 59228d3b9060 ("dt-bindings: Document how Chromebooks with depthcharge boot")
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover.
> See [PATCH 00/12] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1656759988.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
>
>  Documentation/arm/index.rst | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm/index.rst b/Documentation/arm/index.rst
> index 2bda5461a80b..495ada7915e1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arm/index.rst
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ SoC-specific documents
>  .. toctree::
>     :maxdepth: 1
>
> +   google/chromebook-boot-flow
> +

Sure, seems reasonable. It's not truly SoC-specific but I guess
there's no better place for it.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ