lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 19:00:39 +0200 From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, Philippe Boos <pboos@...libre.com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] watchdog: meson: keep running if already active On Wed 06 Jul 2022 at 09:43, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> > [ ... ] > >> >> No worries. That being said, I have gone over >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst >> >> It just says that Reviewed-by sent on the list should be collected for >> the following version. Nothing against adding the tag if the job has >> been done, on or off list. Same goes for Suggested-by, Tested-by, etc. >> >> If I missed something or it is non-written rule, please let me know. > > Your interpretation is quite a strict one. I don't think there is a rule > that states that tags not sent to a list must not be collected. > > Anyway, I would have called it common sense, especially since it does > happen that someone accidentally hits "reply" instead of "reply all" > and replies end up not being sent to the list. If you expect me to dig > through e-mail headers to determine if you meant your tags to be published > or not, sorry, that won't happen. Do not send me e-mails with any tags > unless you accept that they may be published. > > Guenter Exactly. Not expecting anything. I'm 100% aligned with you. Maybe this is where is misunderstanding is. The Reviewed-by was there when Philippe sent his mail. I was meant to be there and taken. Plain and simple. No other expectation whatsoever. I'm not asking for the tag to dropped, quite the opposite actually.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists