linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_mass_storage: forced

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220706205454.2f4483d0@reki>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 20:54:54 +0300
From:   Maxim Devaev <mdevaev@...il.com>
To:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stern@...land.harvard.edu, balbi@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, caihuoqing@...du.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_mass_storage: forced_eject attribute

В Wed,  6 Jul 2022 20:46:34 +0300
Maxim Devaev <mdevaev@...il.com> wrote:

> The patch is a completely alternative implementation of the previously
> proposed [1], the idea of which was born after the mentioned discussion.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220406092445.215288-1-mdevaev@gmail.com [1]

A small comment after that, which is not worth mentioning in the body of the patch.
As discussed in the previous thread, I made a clean implementation to reset
the prevent_medium_removal flag instead of using SIGUSR1, tested it myself,
and then on several thousand of my users. I haven't received a single complaint
in a few months, so I guess everything is working as intended.