linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cover-letter: Simplify vfio_iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220706120325.4741ff34.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:03:25 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc:     <joro@...tes.org>, <will@...nel.org>, <marcan@...can.st>,
        <sven@...npeter.dev>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
        <robdclark@...il.com>, <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        <orsonzhai@...il.com>, <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        <jgg@...dia.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        <dwmw2@...radead.org>, <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <vdumpa@...dia.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>, <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>, <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        <yangyingliang@...wei.com>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cover-letter: Simplify vfio_iommu_type1
 attach/detach routine

On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:53:52 -0700
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 11:42:17AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:44:50 -0700
> > Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > This is a preparatory series for IOMMUFD v2 patches. It enforces error
> > > code -EMEDIUMTYPE in iommu_attach_device() and iommu_attach_group() when
> > > an IOMMU domain and a device/group are incompatible. It also drops the
> > > useless domain->ops check since it won't fail in current environment.
> > >
> > > These allow VFIO iommu code to simplify its group attachment routine, by
> > > avoiding the extra IOMMU domain allocations and attach/detach sequences
> > > of the old code.
> > >
> > > Worths mentioning the exact match for enforce_cache_coherency is removed
> > > with this series, since there's very less value in doing that as KVM will
> > > not be able to take advantage of it -- this just wastes domain memory.
> > > Instead, we rely on Intel IOMMU driver taking care of that internally.
> > >
> > > This is on github:
> > > https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/vfio_iommu_attach  
> > 
> > How do you foresee this going in, I'm imagining Joerg would merge the
> > first patch via the IOMMU tree and provide a topic branch that I'd
> > merge into the vfio tree along with the remaining patches.  Sound
> > right?  Thanks,  
> 
> We don't have any build dependency between the IOMMU change and
> VFIO changes, yet, without the IOMMU one, any iommu_attach_group()
> failure now would be a hard failure without a chance falling back
> to a new_domain, which is slightly different from the current flow.
> 
> For a potential existing use case that relies on reusing existing
> domain, I think it'd be safer to have Joerg acking the first change
> so you merge them all? Thank!

Works for me, I'll look for buy-in + ack from Joerg.  Thanks,

Alex