[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62c5de27.1c69fb81.c73fe.02c5@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:10:30 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: DTS: qcom: fix dtbs_check warning with new
rpmcc clocks
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 05:07:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/07/2022 12:20, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:44:04AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 05/07/2022 22:28, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >>> Fix dtbs_check warning for new rpmcc Documentation changes and add the
> >>> required clocks.
> >>
> >> There is no warning in the kernel, right? So the commit is not correct.
> >>
> >
> > Oh ok, the warning is generated by the new Documentation.
>
> Patches, especially DTS, might go via different trees, so the moment DTS
> is applied there might be no such warning.
>
I'm still confused about this topic...
With this kind of change, I notice I sent Documentation change and then
rob bot complain about dtbs_check having warning...
So the correct way is to send Documentation change and fix dtbs_check
warning in the same commit OR keep what I'm doing with sending
Documentation changes and fix DTS in a separate commit?
I assume separate patch was the way to go but now I'm not sure
anymore...
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists