[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVJG0cA4v+pfyeO8PpzFxtrggNeRrfEB8QFBiEZjYPt3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:44:37 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Fix MAX_DMA_ADDRESS overflow
Hi Florian,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 6:46 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> Commit 26f09e9b3a06 ("mm/memblock: add memblock memory allocation apis")
> added a check to determine whether arm_dma_zone_size is exceeding the
> amount of kernel virtual address space available between the upper 4GB
> virtual address limit and PAGE_OFFSET in order to provide a suitable
> definition of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS that should fit within the 32-bit virtual
> address space. The quantity used for comparison was off by a missing
> trailing 0, leading to MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to be overflowing a 32-bit
> quantity.
>
> This was caught with the bcm2711 platforms which defines a dma_zone_size
> of 1GB, and using a PAGE_OFFSET of 0xc000_0000 (CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G) with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL enabled would lead to MAX_DMA_ADDRESS being
> 0x1_0000_0000 which overflows the unsigned long type used throughout
> __pa() and __virt_addr_valid(). Because the virtual address passed to
> __virt_addr_valid() would now be 0, the function would loudly warn, thus
> making the platform unable to boot properly.
>
> Fixes: 26f09e9b3a06 ("mm/memblock: add memblock memory allocation apis")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>
> - simplify the patch and drop the first patch that attempted to fix an
> off by one in the calculation.
Thanks for the update!
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> #else
> #define MAX_DMA_ADDRESS ({ \
> extern phys_addr_t arm_dma_zone_size; \
> - arm_dma_zone_size && arm_dma_zone_size < (0x10000000 - PAGE_OFFSET) ? \
^^^^^^^^^^
0x10000000ULL, as the constant doesn't fit in 32-bit.
However, both gcc (9.4.0) and sparse don't seem to complain about
the missing suffix (anymore?).
> + arm_dma_zone_size && arm_dma_zone_size < (0x100000000 - PAGE_OFFSET) ? \
> (PAGE_OFFSET + arm_dma_zone_size) : 0xffffffffUL; })
> #endif
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists