lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6cf4bab7-8c38-a2ee-07b9-fc95f901d2cb@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 17:09:21 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     "Alex Xu (Hello71)" <alex_y_xu@...oo.ca>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/Kconfig: Allow X86_X32_ABI with llvm-objcopy in some
 cases

On 7/1/22 14:04, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote:
> According to the comment and commit message, there are issues compiling
> with IBT and/or compressed debug sections. Therefore, the condition
> should be restricted to when those are enabled.

This whole situation is gross.  We code in the vDSO that needs to 
dereference a genuinely 64-bit pointer.  The x32 toolchain doesn't 
understand this, so we have a massive hack using objcopy.  I see a few 
solutions:

1. Keep the hack alive, with further hacks like this patch.

2. Drop the x32 vDSO.

3. Drop x32.

4. Get gcc and/or clang to add actual support for this.

I admit I'm partial to solution #3.  I wonder how practical #4 is.

--Andy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ