[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85fff3f6-373f-3e6a-325e-0fa8ad46273a@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 06:33:54 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"openrisc@...ts.librecores.org" <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
"linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-um@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 00/26] mm/mmap: Drop __SXXX/__PXXX macros from across
platforms
Le 06/07/2022 à 07:57, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
>
>
> On 6/30/22 10:46, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> __SXXX/__PXXX macros is an unnecessary abstraction layer in creating the
>> generic protection_map[] array which is used for vm_get_page_prot(). This
>> abstraction layer can be avoided, if the platforms just define the array
>> protection_map[] for all possible vm_flags access permission combinations
>> and also export vm_get_page_prot() implementation.
>>
>> This series drops __SXXX/__PXXX macros from across platforms in the tree.
>> First it build protects generic protection_map[] array with '#ifdef __P000'
>> and moves it inside platforms which enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. Later
>> this build protects same array with '#ifdef ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT' and
>> moves inside remaining platforms while enabling ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT.
>> This adds a new macro DECLARE_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT defining the current generic
>> vm_get_page_prot(), in order for it to be reused on platforms that do not
>> require custom implementation. Finally, ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT can just
>> be dropped, as all platforms now define and export vm_get_page_prot(), via
>> looking up a private and static protection_map[] array. protection_map[]
>> data type has been changed as 'static const' on all platforms that do not
>> change it during boot.
>>
>> This series applies on v5.19-rc4 and has been build tested for multiple
>> platforms. While here it has dropped off all previous tags from folks after
>> the current restructuring. Series common CC list has been expanded to cover
>> all impacted platforms for wider reach.
>>
>> - Anshuman
>>
>> Changes in V6:
>>
>> - Converted protection_map[] array as 'static const' on sparc32 platform
>> - Rebased on v5.19-rc4
>> - Collected tags
>
> There are two linux-next based build fixes for this series (listed below), when
> vm_get_page_prot() gets redefined with !CONFIG_MMU. Platform vm_get_page_prot()
> is required only with CONFIG_MMU enabled, otherwise there is a generic fallback
> stub in include/linux/mm.h
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220705221411.3381797-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com/ [xtensa]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220706054002.1936820-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ [sh]
>
> It does not seem CONFIG_MMU can be disabled on other platforms thus exposing a build
> failure. But just to be on the safer side, should all vm_get_page_prot() be wrapped
> around with #ifdef CONFIG_MMU ? In that case will resend the series with above build
> fixes folded back in as well. Please do suggest. Thank you.
>
As far as I can see in Kconfig, CONFIG_MMU is user selectable on the
following architectures:
- ARM
- M68K
- RISCV
- SH
And is disabled by default on XTENSA.
So I guess ARM, M68K, RISCV, SH and XTENSA should have it wrapped around
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU , or have it in a file that is not built when
CONFIG_MMU is not set.
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists