[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsUy8jBpt11zoc5E@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 00:00:02 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/bpf: Enable bpf_probe_read{, str}()
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 10:00:42PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> riscv existed as of [0], so I'd argue it is a proper bug fix, as
> corresponding select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE should
> have been added back then.
How much of an eBPF ecosystem was there on RISC-V at the point?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists