linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/ACPI: Set swiotlb area according to the number of lapic entry in MADT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YsVBKgxiQKfnCjvn@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 01:00:42 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, corbet@....net,
        rafael@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com, paulmck@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        songmuchun@...edance.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com,
        kys@...rosoft.com, Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, wei.liu@...nel.org, parri.andrea@...il.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        kirill.shutemov@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/ACPI: Set swiotlb area according to the number
 of lapic entry in MADT

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 01:02:21AM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> > Can we reorder that initialization?  Because I really hate having
> > to have an arch hook in every architecture.
> 
> How about using "flags" parameter of swiotlb_init() to pass area number
> or add new parameter for area number?
> 
> I just reposted patch 1 since there is just some coding style issue and area
> number may also set via swiotlb kernel parameter. We still need figure out a
> good solution to pass area number from architecture code.

What is the problem with calling swiotlb_init after nr_possible_cpus()
works?