[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsVo3ZBHGsodvFwQ@alfio.lan>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:50:05 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@...el.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@...el.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Serialize TLB invalidates with GT
resets
Hi Mauro and Chris,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:09:29AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@...el.com>
>
> Avoid trying to invalidate the TLB in the middle of performing an
> engine reset, as this may result in the reset timing out. Currently,
> the TLB invalidate is only serialised by its own mutex, forgoing the
> uncore lock, but we can take the uncore->lock as well to serialise
> the mmio access, thereby serialising with the GDRST.
>
> Tested on a NUC5i7RYB, BIOS RYBDWi35.86A.0380.2019.0517.1530 with
> i915 selftest/hangcheck.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # Up to 4.4
> Fixes: 7938d61591d3 ("drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store")
> Reported-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@...el.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover.
> See [PATCH v3 0/2] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1656921701.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> index 8da3314bb6bf..68c2b0d8f187 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
> @@ -952,6 +952,20 @@ void intel_gt_invalidate_tlbs(struct intel_gt *gt)
> mutex_lock(>->tlb_invalidate_lock);
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>
> + spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock); /* serialise invalidate with GT reset */
> +
> + for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> + struct reg_and_bit rb;
> +
> + rb = get_reg_and_bit(engine, regs == gen8_regs, regs, num);
> + if (!i915_mmio_reg_offset(rb.reg))
> + continue;
> +
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, rb.reg, rb.bit);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> +
looks good,
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Andi
> for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> /*
> * HW architecture suggest typical invalidation time at 40us,
> @@ -966,7 +980,6 @@ void intel_gt_invalidate_tlbs(struct intel_gt *gt)
> if (!i915_mmio_reg_offset(rb.reg))
> continue;
>
> - intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, rb.reg, rb.bit);
> if (__intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore,
> rb.reg, rb.bit, 0,
> timeout_us, timeout_ms,
> --
> 2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists