[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1657110053.93m1349h4k.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 18:01:29 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel
Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace: Fix SIGSEGV when processing augmented args
Hi Arnaldo,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:52:05PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:57:57PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu:
>> > Yes, it looks like the current check in 'perf' isn't working. The below
>> > patch also resolves the crash we are seeing:
>>
>> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
>> > index 2f1d20553a0aa3..86b459f4ebdd61 100644
>> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
>> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
>> > @@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ static int trace__sys_enter(struct trace *trace, struct evsel *evsel,
>> > * thinking that the extra 2 u64 args are the augmented filename, so just check
>> > * here and avoid using augmented syscalls when the evsel is the raw_syscalls one.
>> > */
>> > - if (evsel != trace->syscalls.events.sys_enter)
>> > + if (strcmp(evsel__name(evsel), "raw_syscalls:sys_enter"))
>> > augmented_args = syscall__augmented_args(sc, sample, &augmented_args_size, trace->raw_augmented_syscalls_args_size);
>> > ttrace->entry_time = sample->time;
>> > msg = ttrace->entry_str;
>>
>> Interesting, that should be equivalent :-\ humm, not really, understood,
>> when processing perf.data files we don't setup
>> trace->syscalls.events.sys_enter...
>>
>> switching from strcmp() to something cheaper but equivalent should be
>> the fix for now.
>
> I'll add a trace->use_augmented_args boolean that will do this test
> once, and then use it in this case and will audit to check if this
> should be used in other places.
Does something like the below look reasonable?
I know this isn't quite what you proposed, but it fixes the problem for
me while avoiding the need for a string comparison. I also think this
addresses all uses in 'perf trace', though I didn't audit the need for a
similar fix elsewhere in 'perf'.
Thanks,
Naveen
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
index d2de2a4073e7eb..352b88a51dec2d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
@@ -4291,6 +4292,8 @@ static int trace__replay(struct trace *trace)
goto out;
}
+ trace->syscalls.events.sys_enter = evsel;
+
evsel = evlist__find_tracepoint_by_name(session->evlist, "raw_syscalls:sys_exit");
if (evsel == NULL)
evsel = evlist__find_tracepoint_by_name(session->evlist, "syscalls:sys_exit");
@@ -4301,6 +4304,8 @@ static int trace__replay(struct trace *trace)
goto out;
}
+ trace->syscalls.events.sys_exit = evsel;
+
evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
if (evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE &&
(evsel->core.attr.config == PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ ||
Powered by blists - more mailing lists