linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/13] ARM: dts: qcom: disable smb208 regulators for ipq8064-rb3011

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:37:36 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] ARM: dts: qcom: disable smb208 regulators for
 ipq8064-rb3011



On 6.07.2022 15:19, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6.07.2022 14:56, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:03:32PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5.07.2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>>>> Mikrotik RB3011 have a special configuration where the regulators are
>>>>> not the common smb208 controlled by RPM but they use a TPS563900
>>>>> controlled via i2c. Disable the smb208 for this specific device.
>>>> Ok, so that answers my question from the previous email.
>>>> Please define the SMB208 regulators only in the DTs of
>>>> boards that actually use it, as it is not a SoC component as
>>>> far as I can tell.
>>>>
>>>> Konrad
>>>
>>> This was already discuessed,
>> Yeah sorry, I didn't notice earlier and started reviewing patches
>> that were already reviewed by others.
>>
> 
> Np, thanks for the review.
> 
>>
>> rb3011 is the exception, qcom for ipq8064
>>> recommends to use smb208 but gives the option to implement it in their
>>> own way. So again we have 28 device with smb208 and 1 device that use
>>> its own special way...
>>>
>>> Wonder if a separate dtsi can be used for this if we really can't put
>>> smb208 in ipq8064 dtsi?
>> There's msm8916-pm8916.dtsi. You can follow.
> 
> Ok, will put the smb208 definition to a separate dtsi, something like
> ipq8064-smb208.dtsi? or ipq8064-rpm-smb208.dtsi? Looks also cleaner that
> way.
You can create ipq8064-smb208.dtsi that will also contain every ipq8064-plus-smb208-specific
configuration, such as regulator assignemnts to in-SoC components (like PHYs, SDHCIs etc.).

Konrad
> 
>>
>> Konrad
>>
>> [...]
>