linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 3/8] hwrng: bcm2835: bcmbca: Replace ARCH_BCM_63XX with ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:18:41 -0700
From:   William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>
To:     Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Cc:     anand.gore@...adcom.com, dan.beygelman@...adcom.com,
        kursad.oney@...adcom.com, joel.peshkin@...adcom.com,
        andre.przywara@....com, cai.huoqing@...ux.dev,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        mpm@...enic.com, sgoutham@...vell.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 3/8] hwrng: bcm2835: bcmbca: Replace ARCH_BCM_63XX
 with ARCH_BCMBCA



On 7/7/22 10:16, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 07/07/2022 18:05, William Zhang wrote:
>> On 7/7/22 09:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 7/6/22 23:57, William Zhang wrote:
>>>> Prepare for the BCM63138 ARCH_BCM_63XX migration to ARCH_BCMBCA. Make
>>>> HW_RANDOM_BCM2835 depending on ARCH_BCMBCA.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>>
>>> There is no cover letter for this 8 patch series :/ it is not clear to me whether each subsystem maintainer will be in a posotion to merge these patches individually, yet still have all 8 (7 of them actually, see comment to patch 1) land in 5.20.
>>>
>> The cover letter will gather all the recipients which will be more than 50
> 
> tbf, you probably could cut down the CC list if you want, it isnt required
> to CC absolutely everyone that gets spat out by get_maintainer.
> 
> For example, I am CCed because I was a recent author for the hwrng kconfig
> file, so people like me could be safely excluded if you need to cut down on
> the number of people that you are CCing.
> 
> Not that I have a problem with being CCed, just if it helps you hit a min.
> threshold feel free to drop me :)
Thanks! That is my plan too. Try to figure out the threshold now lol

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4212 bytes)