[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:50:15 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_guptap@...cinc.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add debug support for TLB sync
timeouts
On 7/6/2022 5:26 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 09:44:03AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> TLB sync timeouts can be due to various reasons such as TBU power down
>> or pending TCU/TBU invalidation/sync and so on. Debugging these often
>> require dumping of some implementation defined registers to know the
>> status of TBU/TCU operations and some of these registers are not
>> accessible in non-secure world such as from kernel and requires SMC
>> calls to read them in the secure world. So, add this debug support
>> to dump implementation defined registers for TLB sync timeout issues.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> * Use scm call consistently so that it works on older chipsets where
>> some of these regs are secure registers.
>> * Add device specific data to get the implementation defined register
>> offsets.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 2 +
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> If this is useful to you, then I suppose it's something we could support,
> however I'm pretty worried about our ability to maintain/scale this stuff
> as it is extended to support additional SoCs and other custom debugging
> features.
>
> Perhaps you could stick it all in arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c and have a new
> config option for that, so at least it's even further out of the way?
>
> Will
Sounds good to me, will do that.
Thanks,
Sai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists