[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 13:03:06 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] clk: Use clk_core_unlink_consumer on __clk_put
For consistency, use clk_core_unlink_consumer rather then hlist_del
directly, on __clk_put. Prepare lock is already acquired at that point.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 7fc191c15507..e1d8245866b1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -4347,7 +4347,7 @@ void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
clk->exclusive_count = 0;
}
- hlist_del(&clk->clks_node);
+ clk_core_unlink_consumer(clk);
if (clk->min_rate > clk->core->req_rate ||
clk->max_rate < clk->core->req_rate)
clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
--
2.34.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists