linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Move wcd specific pin conf to common file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XD8vDPqkax1z6cB7ujOv_82YqkzZA1YNaPAGO+by4xJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jul 2022 06:44:41 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Judy Hsiao <judyhsiao@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Move wcd specific pin conf
 to common file

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 5:36 AM Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
<quic_srivasam@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Move wcd specific pin conf to common file to support various
> herbronie variant boards and to avoid duplicate nodes in dts files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
> ---
> Changes Since V1:
>     -- Remove redundant documentation.
>     -- Update the pincontrol header comment.
>
>  .../dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-audio-wcd9385.dtsi   | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-crd.dts  | 61 ---------------------
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

Looks fine to me now, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>