linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:53:20 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:43 PM Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
> On 2022/7/7 20:58, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 1:05 PM Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
> > Are there any architectures left that use IRQ stacks but don't
> > set HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK? If not, we could
> > also consider removing the Kconfig symbol and just requiring
> > it to be done this way (for non-PREEMPT_RT).
>
> I haven't taken a close look at other architectures than x86 and arm,
> but I think it's a good idea.

I had another look in the meantime, and I think it's only mips and loongarch
now that don't use HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK. Not sure about
arch/um/, which is a bit different from the rest.

       Arnd