[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220708181235.4104943-5-frank.jungclaus@esd.eu>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:12:35 +0200
From: Frank Jungclaus <frank.jungclaus@....eu>
To: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Stefan Mätje <stefan.maetje@....eu>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Jungclaus <frank.jungclaus@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] can: esd_usb: Improved behavior on esd CAN_ERROR_EXT event (3)
Started a rework initiated by Vincents remark about "You should not
report the greatest of txerr and rxerr but the one which actually
increased." Now setting CAN_ERR_CRTL_[RT]X_WARNING and
CAN_ERR_CRTL_[RT]X_PASSIVE depending on REC and TEC
Signed-off-by: Frank Jungclaus <frank.jungclaus@....eu>
---
drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
index 0a402a23d7ac..588caba1453b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
@@ -304,11 +304,17 @@ static void esd_usb_rx_event(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
/* Store error in CAN protocol (location) in data[3] */
cf->data[3] = ecc & SJA1000_ECC_SEG;
- if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING ||
- priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
- cf->data[1] = (txerr > rxerr) ?
- CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE :
- CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
+ /* Store error status of CAN-controller in data[1] */
+ if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING) {
+ if (txerr >= 96)
+ cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING;
+ if (rxerr >= 96)
+ cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
+ } else if (priv->can.state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
+ if (txerr >= 128)
+ cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE;
+ if (rxerr >= 128)
+ cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
}
cf->data[6] = txerr;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists