[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m28rp3pfhz.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 03:14:44 +0800
From: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/rt: fix bad task migration for rt tasks
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 02:19:42 +0800
> Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it's what I did in the V1 patch.
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220623182932.58589-1-schspa@gmail.com/
>>
>> But I think it's not the best solution for this problem.
>> In these scenarios, we still have a chance to make the task run faster
>> by retrying to retry to push the currently running task on this CPU away.
>>
>> There is more details on V2 patch's replay message.
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMA88TrZ-o4W81Yfw9Wcs3ghoxwpeAKtFejtMTt78GNB0tKaSA@mail.gmail.com/#t
>
> The thing is, this situation can only happen if we release the rq lock in
> find_lock_lowest_rq(), and we should not be checking for it in the other
> cases.
>
If we haven't unlock the rq in find_lock_lowest_rq(), it will return
NULL. It won't call this code added.
if (unlikely(is_migration_disabled(next_task))) {
put_task_struct(next_task);
goto retry;
}
deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu);
Beside, find_lock_lowest_rq() return NULL doesn't means rq is rleased,
We need to add a _find_lock_lowest_rq to get the correct rq released
flags?
> Perhaps add the check in find_lock_lowest_rq() and also in the !lowest_rq
> case do:
>
> task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
> if (task == next_task) {
> + /*
> + * If next task has now disabled migrating, see if we
> + * can push the current task.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(is_migrate_disabled(task)))
> + goto retry;
Ahh, It can be added, And do we need this to be a separate PATCH?
> /*
> * The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
> * eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
> * to push it to. Do not retry in this case, since
> * other CPUs will pull from us when ready.
> */
> goto out;
> }
>
> -- Steve
--
BRs
Schspa Shi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists