lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdf5d34e-7668-c05c-9098-30e34939c88a@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 21:32:46 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ive.com>,
        Jude Onyenegecha <jude.onyenegecha@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: ensure io_tlb_default_mem spinlock always
 initialised

On 2022-07-08 18:08, Ben Dooks wrote:
> If the io_tlb_default_mem is used by a device that then gets used
> by the swiotlb code, the spinlock warning is triggered causing a
> lot of stack-trace.

Hang on, how have we got as far as trying to allocate out of an 
uninitialised SWIOTLB at all? That seems like either something's gone 
more fundamentally wrong or we're missing a proper check somewhere. I 
don't think papering over it like this is right.

Thanks,
Robin.

> Fix this by making the structure's lock initialised at build time.
> 
> Avoids the following BUG trigger:
> 
> [    3.046401] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#3, kworker/u8:0/7
> [    3.046689]  lock: io_tlb_default_mem+0x30/0x60, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
> [    3.047217] CPU: 3 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 5.17.0-00056-g1e9bac738084-dirty #310
> [    3.048363] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
> [    3.048892] Call Trace:
> [    3.049224] [<ffffffff800048aa>] dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24
> [    3.049576] [<ffffffff805c5f74>] show_stack+0x2c/0x38
> [    3.049898] [<ffffffff805cade2>] dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x58
> [    3.050216] [<ffffffff805cae0e>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
> [    3.050460] [<ffffffff805c69f6>] spin_dump+0x62/0x6e
> [    3.050681] [<ffffffff8004e000>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xb0/0xd0
> [    3.050934] [<ffffffff805d5b58>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x20/0x2c
> [    3.051157] [<ffffffff80067e38>] swiotlb_tbl_map_single+0xce/0x3da
> [    3.051372] [<ffffffff80068320>] swiotlb_map+0x3a/0x15c
> [    3.051668] [<ffffffff80065a56>] dma_map_page_attrs+0x76/0x162
> [    3.051975] [<ffffffff8031d542>] dw_pcie_host_init+0x326/0x3f2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>
> ---
>   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index cb50f8d38360..a707a944c39a 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
>   static bool swiotlb_force_bounce;
>   static bool swiotlb_force_disable;
>   
> -struct io_tlb_mem io_tlb_default_mem;
> +struct io_tlb_mem io_tlb_default_mem = { .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(io_tlb_default_mem.lock) } ;
>   
>   phys_addr_t swiotlb_unencrypted_base;
>   

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ