[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220708141246.43111241@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:12:46 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
arch/loongarch/Kconfig
between commit:
7fd6ef61a5d6 ("LoongArch: Drop these obsolete selects in Kconfig")
from Linus' tree and commit:
24a9c54182b3 ("context_tracking: Split user tracking Kconfig")
from the rcu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
index 53a912befb62,130dc65f3c85..000000000000
--- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
@@@ -75,7 -76,8 +75,7 @@@ config LOONGARC
select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
- select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
+ select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER
- select HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS
select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
select HAVE_EXIT_THREAD
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists