[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZrvOyYxmJpw=azZ59adeEqnHYqnUXKQProyUKBP5NaUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:22:51 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/bpf: Enable bpf_probe_read{, str}()
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 12:00 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 10:00:42PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > riscv existed as of [0], so I'd argue it is a proper bug fix, as
> > corresponding select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE should
> > have been added back then.
>
> How much of an eBPF ecosystem was there on RISC-V at the point?
No idea, never used RISC-V and didn't pay much attention. But why does
it matter?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists