linux-kernel - [mm-unstable PATCH v5 7/8] mm, hwpoison: skip raw hwpoison page in freeing 1GB hugepage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220708053653.964464-8-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Date:   Fri,  8 Jul 2022 14:36:52 +0900
From:   Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [mm-unstable PATCH v5 7/8] mm, hwpoison: skip raw hwpoison page in freeing 1GB hugepage

From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>

Currently if memory_failure() (modified to remove blocking code with
subsequent patch) is called on a page in some 1GB hugepage, memory error
handling fails and the raw error page gets into leaked state.  The impact
is small in production systems (just leaked single 4kB page), but this
limits the testability because unpoison doesn't work for it.
We can no longer create 1GB hugepage on the 1GB physical address range
with such leaked pages, that's not useful when testing on small systems.

When a hwpoison page in a 1GB hugepage is handled, it's caught by the
PageHWPoison check in free_pages_prepare() because the 1GB hugepage is
broken down into raw error pages before coming to this point:

        if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page)) && !order) {
                ...
                return false;
        }

Then, the page is not sent to buddy and the page refcount is left 0.

Originally this check is supposed to work when the error page is freed from
page_handle_poison() (that is called from soft-offline), but now we are
opening another path to call it, so the callers of __page_handle_poison()
need to handle the case by considering the return value 0 as success. Then
page refcount for hwpoison is properly incremented so unpoison works.

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
- remove "res = MF_FAILED" in try_memory_failure_hugetlb (by Miaohe)
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index e38a94007ffe..cdf266aaabdf 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1084,7 +1084,6 @@ static int me_huge_page(struct page_state *ps, struct page *p)
 		res = truncate_error_page(hpage, page_to_pfn(p), mapping);
 		unlock_page(hpage);
 	} else {
-		res = MF_FAILED;
 		unlock_page(hpage);
 		/*
 		 * migration entry prevents later access on error hugepage,
@@ -1092,9 +1091,11 @@ static int me_huge_page(struct page_state *ps, struct page *p)
 		 * subpages.
 		 */
 		put_page(hpage);
-		if (__page_handle_poison(p) > 0) {
+		if (__page_handle_poison(p) >= 0) {
 			page_ref_inc(p);
 			res = MF_RECOVERED;
+		} else {
+			res = MF_FAILED;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1860,10 +1861,11 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
 	 */
 	if (res == 0) {
 		unlock_page(head);
-		res = MF_FAILED;
-		if (__page_handle_poison(p) > 0) {
+		if (__page_handle_poison(p) >= 0) {
 			page_ref_inc(p);
 			res = MF_RECOVERED;
+		} else {
+			res = MF_FAILED;
 		}
 		action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_FREE_HUGE, res);
 		return res == MF_RECOVERED ? 0 : -EBUSY;
-- 
2.25.1