[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220708071926.zehurtbcf35s5tv6@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 12:49:26 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/13] OPP: Add support for multiple clocks*
On 07-07-22, 22:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This patch breaks Tegra again, please take a look:
Damn, not again :(
> OPP: Remove dev{m}_pm_opp_of_add_table_noclk()
Why did you mention this patch ? This just removed an unused API,
Tegra should have broke because of something else, isn't it ?
> 8<--- cut here ---
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff
> [ffffffff] *pgd=9effd861, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
> Internal error: Oops: 37 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 3 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted
> 5.19.0-rc1-00040-g30b62d123f4f #82
> Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree)
> Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
> PC is at _opp_compare_key+0x40/0xc4
> LR is at 0xfffffffb
How is LR set to such an address ?
> pc : [<c0b91b54>] lr : [<fffffffb>] psr: 20000113
> sp : df831b08 ip : c33cd4d0 fp : df831b24
> r10: c2586078 r9 : c258606c r8 : 00000000
> r7 : 00000000 r6 : 00000001 r5 : c33cd480 r4 : c2586000
> r3 : 00000000 r2 : c33cd480 r1 : c258606c r0 : c2586000
> Flags: nzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none
> Control: 10c5387d Table: 8000404a DAC: 00000051
> ...
> Backtrace:
> _opp_compare_key from _set_opp+0x80/0x408
Whatever happened, happened from _opp_compare_key() and I tried to
look at it many times, couldn't figure out what's wrong there.
For the device in question, pmc I think, we don't have any "opp-hz"
property in the DT, but still the OPP core will fetch its clock and
set clk_count to 1. But this was working earlier too, we were
comparing the rate anyways. I think one of _opp_compare_rate() or
_opp_compare_bw() is broken here, but I just couldn't figure out. The
rate one should run one loop and bw one should just return. I don't
see why a crash should come out eventually.
Can you help debug this a bit ? Also see what are the values of
opp_table->path_count and opp_table->clk_count, should be 0 and 1
AFAICT.
Sorry about this Dmitry, I think we are all settled and again went
into crap.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists