lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:31:10 +0200
From:   Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
        Claire Jensen <cjense@...gle.com>, Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>,
        Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@...q.space>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Claire Jensen <clairej735@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] perf test: Json format checking

On 7/7/22 22:12, Ian Rogers wrote:
> From: Claire Jensen <cjense@...gle.com>
> 
> Add field checking tests for perf stat JSON output.
> Sanity checks the expected number of fields are present, that the
> expected keys are present and they have the correct values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claire Jensen <cjense@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
>  .../tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py  |  95 +++++++++++
>  tools/perf/tests/shell/stat+json_output.sh    | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 242 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py
>  create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/stat+json_output.sh
> 
....
I wonder if it is really necessary to have a python file to post process the
perf stat output?

With
commit 7473ee56dbc9 ("perf test: Add checking for perf stat CSV output.")
the same approach was done which led to issues on s390 and required an additional
patch to fix this:
commit ec906102e5b7 ("perf test: Fix "perf stat CSV output linter" test on s390").

I wonder if you can do the perf stat output checking using bash/linux tools as it
was done in commit ec906102e5b7. This would make maintenance much easier.

Just me 2 cents...

-- 
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ