lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f05a9b04-b635-df6f-1c94-b44371d24041@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 13:33:37 +0200
From:   Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To:     Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        <andy@...nel.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <tiwai@...e.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
        <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>, <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>, <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/string_helpers: Introduce strsplit_u32()

On 2022-07-07 3:51 PM, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 07/07/2022 12:13, Cezary Rojewski wrote:

...

>> +int strsplit_u32(const char *str, const char *delim, u32 **tkns, size_t *num_tkns)
>> +{
>> +	size_t max_count = 32;
>> +	size_t count = 0;
>> +	char *s, **p;
>> +	u32 *buf, *tmp;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	p = (char **)&str;
>> +	*tkns = NULL;
>> +	*num_tkns = 0;
>> +
>> +	buf = kcalloc(max_count, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!buf)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	while ((s = strsep(p, delim)) != NULL) {
>> +		ret = kstrtouint(s, 0, buf + count);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto free_buf;
>> +
>> +		if (++count > max_count) {
> 
> I think this should be as it was originally:
> if (++count >= max_count) {
> 
> Otherwise when we reach the max_count we would not realloc to get more
> space and the data + max_count is pointing outside of the allocated area.

I believe you're right. Will change in v2.


Regards,
Czarek

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ