linux-kernel - [PATCH v8 3/3] mfd: atmel-flexcom: Add support for lan966x flexcom chip-select configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220708115619.254073-4-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:56:19 -0200
From:   Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>
To:     <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
CC:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 3/3] mfd: atmel-flexcom: Add support for lan966x flexcom chip-select configuration

LAN966x SoC have 5 flexcoms. Each flexcom has 2 chip-selects
which are optional I/O lines. For each chip select of each
flexcom there is a configuration register FLEXCOM_SHARED[0-4]:SS_MASK[0-1].
The width of configuration register is 21 because there are
21 shared pins on each of which the chip select can be mapped.
Each bit of the register represents a different FLEXCOM_SHARED pin.

Signed-off-by: Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>
---
v7 -> v8:
 - Changed compatible string to microchip,lan9668-flexcom.

v6 -> v7:
 - No changes.

v5 -> v6:
 - No changes.

v4 -> v5:
 - No changes.

v3 -> v4:
 - Add condition for a flexcom whether to configure chip-select lines
   or not, based on "microchip,flx-shrd-pins" property existence because
   chip-select lines are optional.

v2 -> v3:
 - used goto label for clk_disable in error cases.

v1 -> v2:
 - use GENMASK for mask, macros for maximum allowed values.
 - use u32 values for flexcom chipselects instead of strings.
 - disable clock in case of errors.

 drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c b/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c
index 33caa4fba6af..92ea15d5fd72 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c
@@ -28,15 +28,68 @@
 #define FLEX_MR_OPMODE(opmode)	(((opmode) << FLEX_MR_OPMODE_OFFSET) &	\
 				 FLEX_MR_OPMODE_MASK)
 
+/* LAN966x flexcom shared register offsets */
+#define FLEX_SHRD_SS_MASK_0	0x0
+#define FLEX_SHRD_SS_MASK_1	0x4
+#define FLEX_SHRD_PIN_MAX	20
+#define FLEX_CS_MAX		1
+#define FLEX_SHRD_MASK		GENMASK(20, 0)
+
+struct atmel_flex_caps {
+	bool has_flx_cs;
+};
+
 struct atmel_flexcom {
 	void __iomem *base;
+	void __iomem *flexcom_shared_base;
 	u32 opmode;
 	struct clk *clk;
 };
 
+static int atmel_flexcom_lan966x_cs_config(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct atmel_flexcom *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	u32 flx_shrd_pins[2], flx_cs[2], val;
+	int err, i, count;
+
+	count = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "microchip,flx-shrd-pins");
+	if (count <= 0 || count > 2) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid %s property (%d)\n", "flx-shrd-pins",
+				count);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	err = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "microchip,flx-shrd-pins", flx_shrd_pins, count);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "microchip,flx-cs", flx_cs, count);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		if (flx_shrd_pins[i] > FLEX_SHRD_PIN_MAX)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		if (flx_cs[i] > FLEX_CS_MAX)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		val = ~(1 << flx_shrd_pins[i]) & FLEX_SHRD_MASK;
+
+		if (flx_cs[i] == 0)
+			writel(val, ddata->flexcom_shared_base + FLEX_SHRD_SS_MASK_0);
+		else
+			writel(val, ddata->flexcom_shared_base + FLEX_SHRD_SS_MASK_1);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int atmel_flexcom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	const struct atmel_flex_caps *caps;
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct atmel_flexcom *ddata;
 	int err;
@@ -76,13 +129,52 @@ static int atmel_flexcom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 */
 	writel(FLEX_MR_OPMODE(ddata->opmode), ddata->base + FLEX_MR);
 
+	caps = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+	if (!caps) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not retrieve flexcom caps\n");
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto clk_disable;
+	}
+
+	if (caps->has_flx_cs && of_property_read_bool(np, "microchip,flx-shrd-pins")) {
+		ddata->flexcom_shared_base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1, NULL);
+		if (IS_ERR(ddata->flexcom_shared_base)) {
+			err = dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev,
+					PTR_ERR(ddata->flexcom_shared_base),
+					"failed to get flexcom shared base address\n");
+			goto clk_disable;
+		}
+
+		err = atmel_flexcom_lan966x_cs_config(pdev);
+		if (err)
+			goto clk_disable;
+	}
+
+clk_disable:
 	clk_disable_unprepare(ddata->clk);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	return devm_of_platform_populate(&pdev->dev);
 }
 
+static const struct atmel_flex_caps atmel_flexcom_caps = {};
+
+static const struct atmel_flex_caps lan966x_flexcom_caps = {
+	.has_flx_cs = true,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id atmel_flexcom_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-flexcom" },
+	{
+		.compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-flexcom",
+		.data = &atmel_flexcom_caps,
+	},
+
+	{
+		.compatible = "microchip,lan9668-flexcom",
+		.data = &lan966x_flexcom_caps,
+	},
+
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_flexcom_of_match);
-- 
2.25.1