linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] drm: selftest: Convert to KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e49487ae-3531-1baa-4277-83d858c28837@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:42:57 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>,
        Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>, magalilemes00@...il.com,
        tales.aparecida@...il.com, mwen@...lia.com, andrealmeid@...eup.net,
        siqueirajordao@...eup.net, Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...il.com>,
        leandro.ribeiro@...labora.com, n@...aprado.net,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        michal.winiarski@...el.com,
        José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, brendanhiggins@...gle.com
Cc:     kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] drm: selftest: Convert to KUnit

Hello Maíra,

On 7/2/22 15:17, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 7/2/22 15:11, Maíra Canal wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Here is the v4 of the conversion of selftests to KUnit. Since the v3, there
>> have been minor fixes, asked by Javier. Basically, fixes on the SoB chain and
>> addition of Copywrites.
>>
>> Thanks for your attention and any feedback is welcomed!
>>
> 
> Thanks a lot for the quick re-spin of the series! I'll wait a few days in case
> someone else has additional feedback and then push to drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
>  

I wanted to apply this but noticed that there are a tons of checkpatch script
warnings and checks failings. Could you please take a look with the following:

./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f drivers/gpu/drm/tests/*.c

and fix the ones that you think are not false positives (I think most of the
issues pointed out are correct). I could fix them before pushing but I prefer
if you do, to prevent me adding any regressions while modifying your patches.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat