linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for IFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ce8aa53-ed70-823f-3410-1f50d5b902c9@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:57:13 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>, markgross@...nel.org,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for IFS

Hi Tony,

On 7/10/22 20:25, Tony Luck wrote:
> Hans ... if you are pushing to Linus to add "BROKEN", then could
> you include these two patches to make it fractionally less broken?

Since the driver is going to be marked as BROKEN now anyways,
I don't see much value in getting these send last minute to Linus.

At this point in the kernel cycle (rc6 will be out in a couple
of hours likely) we really should avoid churn as much as possible.

Regards,

Hans